How is the Dutch food supply chain coping during the corona crisis?

Supply chain – The COVID-19 pandemic has certainly had the impact of its influence on the world. health and Economic indicators have been compromised and all industries have been touched in one of the ways or perhaps some other. One of the industries in which it was clearly visible would be the agriculture as well as food business.

In 2019, the Dutch farming and food industry contributed 6.4 % to the disgusting domestic product (CBS, 2020). According to the FoodService Instituut, the foodservice industry in the Netherlands lost € 7.1 billion inside 2020[1]. The hospitality trade lost 41.5 % of its turnover as show by ProcurementNation, while at the identical time supermarkets increased their turnover with € 1.8 billion.

supply chain
supply chain

Disruptions of the food chain have big consequences for the Dutch economy as well as food security as lots of stakeholders are affected. Though it was clear to majority of folks that there was a significant impact at the end of the chain (e.g., hoarding doing grocery stores, restaurants closing) and also at the beginning of this chain (e.g., harvested potatoes not searching for customers), you will find a lot of actors in the source chain for that will the effect is much less clear. It is therefore imperative that you find out how properly the food supply chain as being a whole is prepared to contend with disruptions. Researchers from your Operations Research and Logistics Group at Wageningen Faculty and out of Wageningen Economics Research, led by Professor Sander de Leeuw, studied the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic throughout the food supply chain. They based the examination of theirs on interviews with about 30 Dutch supply chain actors.

Demand within retail up, in food service down It’s apparent and popular that need in the foodservice channels went down as a result of the closure of places, amongst others. In a few instances, sales for suppliers in the food service business thus fell to aproximatelly twenty % of the original volume. As an adverse reaction, demand in the list stations went up and remained within a degree of aproximatelly 10 20 % higher than before the problems began.

Products which had to come via abroad had the own issues of theirs. With the shift in demand from foodservice to retail, the demand for packaging improved dramatically, More tin, cup and plastic was required for use in buyer packaging. As much more of this packaging material ended up in consumers’ homes as opposed to in places, the cardboard recycling function got disrupted too, causing shortages.

The shifts in desire have had an important impact on output activities. In some cases, this even meant a total stop of output (e.g. within the duck farming business, which came to a standstill on account of demand fall-out in the foodservice sector). In other cases, a major portion of the personnel contracted corona (e.g. in the meat processing industry), leading to a closure of facilities.

Supply chain  – Distribution activities were also affected. The beginning of the Corona crisis of China caused the flow of sea containers to slow down pretty soon in 2020. This resulted in restricted transport capability during the earliest weeks of the crisis, and costs which are high for container transport as a result. Truck travel experienced different issues. Initially, there were uncertainties about how transport will be handled at borders, which in the long run weren’t as rigid as feared. The thing that was problematic in instances that are most , nevertheless, was the availability of drivers.

The reaction to COVID-19 – provide chain resilience The supply chain resilience analysis held by Prof. de Colleagues as well as Leeuw, was based on the overview of this primary elements of supply chain resilience:

To us this framework for the assessment of the interview, the findings show that few businesses were well prepared for the corona problems and in fact mostly applied responsive practices. Probably the most notable source chain lessons were:

Figure one. Eight best methods for meals supply chain resilience

For starters, the need to design the supply chain for agility and flexibility. This seems particularly challenging for smaller sized companies: building resilience into a supply chain takes time and attention in the organization, and smaller organizations usually don’t have the potential to accomplish that.

Next, it was found that much more attention was necessary on spreading threat as well as aiming for risk reduction in the supply chain. For the future, this means far more attention has to be made available to the way organizations count on suppliers, customers, and specific countries.

Third, attention is necessary for explicit prioritization and intelligent rationing strategies in cases in which demand can’t be met. Explicit prioritization is required to keep on to meet market expectations but in addition to increase market shares in which competitors miss options. This challenge is not new, but it has additionally been underexposed in this problems and was usually not a component of preparatory pursuits.

Fourthly, the corona problems shows you us that the monetary result of a crisis also depends on the way cooperation in the chain is actually set up. It is typically unclear how additional expenses (and benefits) are actually sent out in a chain, in case at all.

Lastly, relative to other functional departments, the operations and supply chain functions are actually in the driving seat during a crisis. Product development and advertising and marketing activities have to go hand in hand with supply chain events. Regardless of whether the corona pandemic will structurally switch the basic considerations between logistics and generation on the one hand and advertising on the other, the future will need to tell.

How’s the Dutch meal supply chain coping throughout the corona crisis?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *